- Verstreuen from GH
- Posts
- šØš¦š„ From Programmed to Principled
šØš¦š„ From Programmed to Principled
Verstreuen from GH

Welcome to Verstreuenāmeaning āto scatterāāwhere I unpack the ideas Iāve collected this week in my šļø Zettelkasten, ānote box,ā personal knowledge management system. Here, Iāll share the highlights, insights, and stories I find interestingāand think you will too!
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
šļø This Weekās Highlights
This week's notes come from 11 new additions to the Zettelkastenāhereās the three that stood out most to share with you:
šØ Households as Ideological Engines
š¦ Stability Isnāt Leadership
š„ The Power of Curated Principles
šØšØšØ
Households serve as the primary socializing agencies of the world-system, teaching social rules and norms
Where we grow up explains more about us than we like to admit.
I experienced failure today in the middle of a new projectāwith tight timelines, different working styles, and not enough handsāIāve found myself pulling extra weight. Not out of obligation, exactly, but because I want the team to succeed. Iāve been asking myself where that drive comes from.
I used to think it came from ambition. Or from books. Or from something I consciously chose. But looking back, I realize it started long before I had a framework for it. It was shaped on quiet Sunday mornings at church with my dad. Weād be up by 5:45am, driving through the cold morning air to set up folding chairs before anyone else arrived. It didnāt feel like work. It was just part of what we did.
Only now do I see what was really happening: the repetition of small actsārising early, showing up, setting up. it wasnāt just about helping out. It was a way of learning what mattered, not through explanation, but through repetition.
Thatās what households do. They donāt explaināthey encode.
They donāt teach valuesāthey instil them.
Capitalism, roles, work ethicāthey donāt arrive through manifestos. They arrive through birthday budgets, chore charts, and what gets talked about at dinner.
The home is not a neutral space. Itās the most efficient delivery mechanism for global ideologies. It personalizes the system.
So the real question is:
How much of what we believe simply made sense in that room?
And what happens when we begin to outgrow it?
āšļøā
š¦š¦š¦
Individuals who wish to be class-mobile often find that they must withdraw from the households
We got laughed out of the room.
The meeting was supposed to be straightforward: validate our understanding of the clientās current state, get alignment, move forward. Instead, the diagram we shared became the focal pointānot as a collaborative artifact, but as a target.
The sponsorās message was clear: You already have everything you need.
Translation: You should have known better.
We hadnāt fully aligned. And that failureāof clarity, of leadership, of framingālanded squarely in the middle of the room. No one caught it. No one redirected. Least of all, me.
Because even though I saw the gap forming, I didnāt step in to close it.
In that moment, I realized something Iāve been doing for a long time:
I play ballast, not the sail.
When things feel off, I stabilize. I support. I make myself useful.
But I donāt take the wheelāespecially not when the waters get choppy.
Itās not just habit. Itās a strategy.
A risk-aversion strategy I learned early.
One I watched modeled in the quiet steadiness of my parents.
They didnāt chase visibility.
They kept things running.
They made the hard parts easier for othersāwithout complaint, without spotlight.
That mode of contribution shaped me.
It made me reliable. Grounded. Trusted.
But in that meeting, it made me silent.
I wasnāt just waiting for someone to lead. I was hoping I wouldnāt have to.
Because leading meant risk.
Risk of getting it wrong. Of being the face of imperfection.
Of stepping into a moment without a guarantee.
But thatās exactly what was missing.
Wallerstein said class mobility often requires withdrawing from the household, the collective idenity that was shared.
what we need to leave behind isnāt the houseāitās the operating system we inherited from it.
It seems it might be time to step out of my comfort zone, outgrow the ballast strategy.
This project doesnāt just need a stabilizer.
It needs someone willing to steer.
And that means stepping out of the role I was raised to playāinto one Iām still learning how to claim.
āšļøā
š„š„š„
Strategic Decision Making - Guiding Principles (People-first mindset, Collaborative leadership, High-value relationships, Logical planning over hope, Lead with conviction.)
Somewhere between Idaho and Ohio, flying home from Oregon, I stumbled across a MasterClass in Deltaās in-flight entertainment system.
I didnāt even realize MasterClass was available on planesāit felt like discovering YouTube mid-flight, I was learning something valuable instead of just passing time with another movie. (Also, why havenāt they added YouTube to planes yet smh.)
I scrolled through the options and landed on Strategic Decision-Making with Mellody Hobson. I tapped play, not expecting muchābut I was quickly drawn in by the clarity and strength of the frameworks she shared.
The lesson was sharp. But more than the content, what struck me was the presence of someone who had clearly curated thier internal operating system with intention.
And it made me realize: I want to do that too.
consciously gather the principles that will guide what comes next.
Until recently, I hadnāt thought much about where my principles came from.
They were just⦠there. Unexamined. Inherited through culture, family, habit.
But principles arenāt fixed.
You donāt just inherit them.
You have the power to choose them
and the permission to shape them.
You get to decide who and what shapes you. You can build your internal compass from the people you admire, the ideas that resonate, the institutions you trust. Youāre not stuck with the default settings.
That kind of agency is subtle but profound.
It doesnāt come from shouting louder or knowing more.
It comes from choosingādeliberately.
Iām paying attentionāto what matters, lasts, and what I want to build on.
Because if Iām going to live by principles, I want them to be truly mine.
Not just echoes of my pastābut foundations for my future.
The version of me Iām growing into will need clarity, consistency, and courage.
So Iām not just choosing what feels good today.
Iām choosing the principles that will prepare me for who Iām becoming.
That shiftāfrom inherited to intentional, from reactive to strategicā
might be the most important decision Iāve made yet.
āšļøā

Closing Thoughts
The ideas that shape us often start at homeābut they donāt have to determine where we end up.
Maybe itās a work ethic shaped by weekend routines, the habit of maintaining stability instead of seeking change, or unspoken rules about how to belong. Often, we find ourselves following patterns we didnāt choose. But that doesnāt mean we canāt change them.
I consider myself incredibly fortunate. My parents didnāt just talk about valuesāthey lived them. Through early mornings, quiet consistency, and acts of care that often went unnoticed, they passed down lessons I still carry today.
Still, even the most meaningful inheritance isnāt a complete map. Eventually, weāre called to do more than preserve what weāve been givenāweāre asked to interrogate it. To sift through the habits and principles weāve outgrown. To choose whatās worth keeping. And to consciously build a framework for the life we actually want to lead.
Because growing up doesnāt just mean doing more.
It means deciding what to do differently.
And in that processāof questioning, choosing, and evolvingāwe start to become someone new.
Someone not just shaped by where they came from, but defined by where weāre going.
Thanks for reading Verstreuen! š Until next week -GH
