Verstreuen [ver-ˈstrɔɪ̯-ən]

verb (German)

1. to scatter; to spread widely.

2. (versehentlich) to spill, often by accident.

Verstreuen is my weekly ritual of revisiting notes to find the ideas worth carrying into the next week.

_{Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more}

🗃️ This Week’s Highlights

This week's notes come from 34 new additions to the Zettelkasten - here’s the three that stood out most to share with you:

🟨 The reason change feels hard has nothing to do with discipline

🟦 What you keep shapes how you think

🟥 Why success is determined by how quickly you start

I came across an idea recently that completely reframed how I think about change.

Your default state - the way you live, think, and act - isn’t accidental. It’s the most energy-efficient version of your life. Over time, your brain has optimized it, reinforcing patterns that require the least effort to maintain.

That’s why change feels so hard.

Not because you lack discipline, but because anything outside of that default costs more energy.

It’s like being stuck in a local minimum.

Where you are now feels stable and efficient, even if it’s not where you want to be. And to reach something better, you can’t just move sideways - you have to go uphill first. You have to spend more energy, try less efficient paths, and sit with the uncertainty of whether it will pay off.

Most of us misread that uphill effort as failure.

We start a new habit, feel resistance, and assume something is wrong.
So we fall back to what’s familiar - the system our brain already knows how to run cheaply.

New behaviors are expensive - at least at the start.
Which changes how you should approach growth.

If the problem is energy - not willpower - then the solution isn’t to try harder.
It’s to lower the cost of the new behavior.

Make it smaller.
Make it simpler.
Make it easier to start than to avoid.

Lay out your workout clothes the night before.
Do five minutes instead of an hour.
Put friction in front of distractions instead of relying on restraint.

Don’t try to overpower the system. Redesign it.

Because the version of you that exists today was built through repetition of what was easiest.

And the version you want will be built the same way - by making better behaviors easier to repeat.

 📎 Takeaway:
The brain resists change because change is expensive - not because it’s wrong

—🗃️—

Thinking improves when it produces artifacts.

This became clear while working through ideas with AI at a whiteboard. The process alternated between open-ended discussion and deliberate pauses to capture what had just been said - turning fragments of thought into short documents.

At first, those pauses felt like interruptions. But they were doing real work.

The moment an idea was written down, it changed. It became constrained, visible, and easier to evaluate. What had been loose and ambiguous became something we could build on.

A pattern emerged:

1. generate ideas

2. externalize them

3. continue from what had been made

Each pass produced clearer thinking because each pass started from something concrete.

The artifacts didn’t just capture thinking. They stabilized it.

Thought, on its own, is unstable - it reshapes too easily. It only becomes reliable when it takes form outside the mind.

Not everything we generated mattered.

Some ideas were useful.
Some weren’t.
Some were refined. Others were ignored.

Which meant the real process wasn’t just generation.

It was generation + selection.

Thinking improves not just by producing artifacts, but by choosing which ones to keep. Selection creates continuity. It determines what becomes the next starting point.

Over time, the refined artifacts accumulated and linked together, forming a network. That network wasn’t just a record of thinking - it was the mechanism that allowed thinking to progress.

The same structure appears in a different context: collections.

Walking through the airport while listening to a Bossa Nova playlist, I realized that the playlist itself was an artifact. The songs weren’t original - the selection was.

Each track was a choice: kept, revisited, added because it fit. Some songs were skipped. Some didn’t belong. Others stayed and came to define the whole.

A collection is what remains after repeated selection.

Shaping a collection is the same act as thinking. It turns passive accumulation into an active system.

Seen this way, collections are artifacts. Both are externalized thought. Both improve through iteration. Both depend on selection to become meaningful.

A collection isn’t what you gather. It’s what survives selection - and becomes an artifact of how you think.

 📎 Takeaway:
A collection isn’t just what you save - it’s an artifact of how you think

—🗃️—

There’s a version of my life where I follow through on everything I say I’ll do. I wake up early, write for an hour, go to the gym, ship ideas, and stay consistent with what matters.

And there’s another version where I think about doing all those things. I plan them, intend to do them, even see myself as someone who would - but somehow, these things never quite happen.

The difference between those two lives is surprisingly small. It’s not talent, knowledge, or even motivation. It’s the time between deciding to act and actually acting.

That gap seems trivial, but it’s where most outcomes are determined.

Because the gap isn’t neutral - it comes with resistance. A friction coefficient on your existence.

Every action has a starting cost: opening your laptop, putting on your shoes, writing the first sentence. And right before you begin, friction shows up as small delays - check something first, start in a minute, wait until you feel ready.

Each delay feels harmless in isolation, but they compound. The longer the gap, the more chances friction has to stop you.

The people who appear consistent aren’t necessarily more disciplined. They’ve just reduced that gap. They’ve structured things so action happens before overthinking, before resistance has time to build.

Your life is a system of forces. Some actions are easy to start, others aren’t. Some paths are smooth, others are full of resistance. Seen this way, what separates outcomes isn’t what you intend to do - it’s how often you actually start.

The life you end up living is the one with the lowest barrier to action.

Which means the goal isn’t to try harder. It’s to reduce the cost of starting - making the first step small enough that you don’t hesitate, removing the need to think before you begin, and acting before the decision has time to reopen.

Because once you do that momentum stops being something you force, and starts being something that follows.

What looks like discipline from the outside is often just a system where starting is easy.

 📎 Takeaway:
The shorter the gap between deciding and doing, the more your life reflects your intentions

—🗃️—

Closing Thoughts

This week’s ideas point to a simple constraint:

Your life follows what’s easiest to repeat.

Not what’s most important.
Not what you intend.
What your systems make easy.

Your brain returns to what costs the least energy.
Your thinking improves when it’s made visible and reusable.
Your actions follow whatever has the lowest barrier to start.

Which means the leverage isn’t in trying harder - it’s in changing what’s easy.

Make the right actions cheaper to start.
Make the wrong ones harder to continue.
And externalize what matters so it can compound instead of reset.

Because once something becomes easy to repeat, it stops requiring effort - and starts shaping your life automatically.

🟨🟦🟥 Join the Workframe Community

Be apart of a close community of readers and people who want to explore reflect and share their ideas in a community of like minded people.

→ Come hang out!

Until next week
-GH

Thanks for reading Verstreuen! 👋